Opinions & Editorials

Patent 'reform' bill is no stimulus for Missouri
St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Op-Ed By David Snively
February 24, 2008
Permalink
Synopsis: "As we contemplate who will be our next president, it is a good time to reflect on the wisdom of our nation's most influential leaders.
Inventor and President Abraham Lincoln said the introduction of the patent laws was one of the three most important developments in the world's history, along with the discovery of America and the perfection of printing, saying "the patent system added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius."
Lately, there has been a lot of interest on the part of certain companies in changing patent law and a fair amount of genius in naming this effort The Patent Reform Act of 2007, or PRA." Read More >>

A mistake to weaken U.S. patent rights
NewJersey Star Ledger: Op-Ed By Daniele Capezzone
(a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies)
November 26, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis: "Advocates claim that the proposed changes would bring the American patent system in line with the European one. Litigation procedures would be streamlined and international cooperation enhanced.

But as a member of the Italian Parliament who is deeply familiar with the European patent system, I believe such a move would be a step backward for patent rights in the United States. It also would retard the efforts of Italy's Parliamentary Productivity Committee to import American-style intellectual property protections into our dormant and overregulated pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors." Read More >>

Don't Let Patent Regs Kill Golden Goose
Investor’s Business Daily: Op-Ed By Sally C. Pipes
November 20, 2006
Permalink
Synopsis: "The Patent Reform Act of 2007, while purporting to bring efficiency and flexibility to the patent system, would actually water down existing patent protections.

This may be good for a few large technology firms, whose products incorporate hundreds or even thousands of patented components. But it will inflict serious harm on small entrepreneurs and research-based health science firms, whose livelihoods depend on marketing just a handful of lifesaving inventions." Read More >>

Beware patent reform
San Francisco Chronicle: Op-Ed by Dan Leckrone
November 5, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis: "High-tech Goliaths who routinely flaunt the law by abusing their market power are consistently rebuked for regarding themselves as being "above the law" - and justifiably so. The Patent Reform Act now up for vote in the U.S. Senate is but the latest blatant example of how Goliaths are wielding their power to smother innovation. Indeed, the Goliaths seek a major overhaul of our patent system that would pave the way for them to roll over competitors by misappropriating their intellectual property."
Read More >>

A dangerous one-two punch
Financial Times: Op-ed by Richard Epstein
October 24, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis: “Right now, patent holders everywhere are warily watching the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA) as it winds its way, perhaps inexorably, through the US Congress. One of its key provisions deals with the proper measure of damages in patent cases - a topic that takes on extra importance after the US Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Ebay v. MercExchange.” Read More >>

Patent pain
Houston Chronicle: Editorial
Sept. 28, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis: “Patents protect ideas and allow entities and individuals to profit from their work. Weak patent laws are a disincentive to creativity and could saddle the country with patent regulation that stymies innovation and hampers American competitiveness in international markets.”
Read More >>

The rules of patent reform: First, do no harm
Wisconsin Technology Network: Jim Greenwood
September 5, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis/ quote: “Unfortunately, the legislation currently pending in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, would do more harm than good to the current patent system. The legislation contains several provisions that would devalue patent rights, which could undermine the very foundation upon which biotechnology innovation, and the hopeful future it promises, is built.” Read More >>

Patent Reforms Fall Short Of What State Firms Need
Hartford Courant: OP-eds by John L. LaMattina and J. Martin Carroll
(presidents of Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim, respectively)
August 29, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis: “Unfortunately, the reliability of our patents is threatened by federal legislation that is under consideration in the House and the Senate. Called The Patent Reform Act of 2007, this legislation makes important beneficial changes that would further align U.S. patent laws with the rules that apply in major jurisdictions outside the country. Unfortunately, it also includes provisions that would limit the value of patents, and it does not include useful reforms that were recommended by the National Academies, advisers to the nation on science, engineering and medicine.”
Read More >>

Patent bill jeopardizes life sciences innovation
Indianapolis Star: Op-Ed by Sidney Taurel
August 19, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis:“As currently written, the Patent Reform Act of 2007 would greatly limit the damages many inventors could receive when their patents are violated, and create a new administrative process for attacking patents via the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office -- without court protection.”
Read More >>

The laptop vs. the pill bottle
San Francisco Chronicle: Editorial
August 5, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis: “The contending forces make up the fast-growing sectors of California's - and the nation's - economy. A consensus decision that avoids extremes is clearly needed.” Read More >>

Patently flawed
Boston Globe: Editorial
July 23, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis: “INNOVATIONS protected by patents are a wellspring of the US economy -- and especially of the Massachusetts economy. So any congressional reform of the patent law should follow a basic rule of medicine: "First, do no harm." If the current law were as deeply flawed as some critics say, Kendall Square in Cambridge would not be the envy of other nations seeking to create their own incubators of new technology. The most serious problem with the patent system is not its ground rules but simply understaffing of the patent office.”Read More >>

Stop the attempt to weaken patent system
Concord Monitor: Editorial
June 25, 2007
Permalink
Synopsis: "Some of the nation's biggest information technology companies are backing a congressional effort led by Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy to, under the guise of "reform," infringe on the ability of patents to protect the rights of their owners. The move threatens the small companies that drive New Hampshire's economy, and the state's congressional delegation should oppose it." Read More >>